01 / Context
Program and decision
Define whose conditions are being governed, by whom, under which schedule and authority.
02 / Institutional conditions
Governance scan
Score whether policies, authority, practice, and evidence support athlete welfare. Scores organize inquiry; they are not medical conclusions.
03 / Voice without retaliation
Participation and data dignity
Design athlete input so opting out, reporting concerns, or disagreeing does not threaten selection, playing time, scholarship, employment, or care.
Do not convert care into surveillance. Collect the minimum data needed for a defined purpose; separate welfare support from punitive selection decisions; offer meaningful alternatives; and use qualified privacy, labor, safeguarding, and medical review.
04 / Owned improvement
Action register
Turn gaps into bounded actions with owners, dates, athlete participation, evidence, and dependencies.
05 / When conditions become unsafe
Escalation and review
Make independent reporting, response authority, urgent care, evidence preservation, and non-retaliation explicit.
06 / Decision packet
90-day governance roadmap
A portable record of context, conditions, athlete voice, owned actions, escalation, uncertainty, and professional review.
—Scan / 5
0Actions
0Immediate
0%Complete